http://robwilkerson.org/2008/05/18/powered-by-pulse/feed 2008-05-19T15:03:31-04:00 Chyrp tag:robwilkerson.org,2008-05-19:/id/66//comment_140 2008-05-19T15:03:31-04:00 2008-05-19T15:03:31-04:00 Rob Wilkerson http://robwilkerson.org <p>As I mentioned, I haven’t had the chance to try v2.x yet. If these issues have been fixed, I may just do that. I really like what Pulse is trying to do, but the shortcomings of the first release were just too distracting.</p> <p>Thanks for sharing this information. I’ll post my thoughts on 2.x once I’ve had a chance to work with it.</p> tag:robwilkerson.org,2008-05-19:/id/66//comment_139 2008-05-19T14:55:55-04:00 2008-05-19T14:55:55-04:00 Jens http://www.poweredbypulse.com <p>Rob;</p> <p>Thanks for posting your thoughts on Pulse. We value any and all feedback.</p> <p>You mentioned knowing a new release of Pulse was out. Have you had a chance to give it a try? I ask because in Pulse 2.x, we’ve changed the <span class="caps">IDE</span> launch flow to take server connectivity entirely out of the loop for Eclipse startup. </p> <p>Using any of the Pulse 2.x technology, you will not run into your described issue. Instead, you will be directly launching the <span class="caps">IDE</span> so whether on a plane or not, you can keep using your chosen software along with Pulse functionalities. </p> <p>During the initial releases of Pulse (which it appears you are utilizing), having the Pulse technology as a blocking step to launch an <span class="caps">IDE</span> was both a performance hit as well as a potential reliability concern and we therefore changed that flow in Pulse 2.</p> <p>Please let me know if Pulse 2.1 (available now) solves these issues for you, and please let us and/or the world know your thoughts on the matter.</p> <p>Thanks again,<br /> Jens<br /> Pulse team</p>